E. L. James

The Religion and Political Views of E. L. James

Summary

Religion

E. L. James appears to be non-religious, but seems annoyed at the conservative Christian criticisms of her books.

Political Views

While women all over the internet debate her books' implications for feminism in the 21st century, James stays completely out of the debate.

Wiki

Erika Leonard, better known by her pen name E. L. James, was born and raised in Buckinghamshire, England.

Being an Englishwoman, one can assume that James has had some Christian influence in her life. Her mother is from Chile, a predominantly Catholic country,[1] and her father is from Scotland, a predominantly Presbyterian country in the U.K.[2] But James herself doesn't seem to talk about religion all that much.

James' books, the Fifty Shades trilogy, sometimes dubbed "mommy porn" for their sexually explicit content, don't rule out the possibility that she's a Christian, but they do rule out that she's a conservative Christian. The backlash from that particular religious community comes as no shock. One Christian author wrote,

I wouldn't drive my Envoy into the front of an oncoming semi-truck any more than I would open the pages of ,Fifty Shades of Grey,.[3]

James' response to all the criticism possibly betrays some resentment toward the community that most vocally denounces her morality:

"Mommy porn" is the most misogynistic term. It's so demeaning. Women aren't allowed to write about sex, to read about sex, to think about sex. God forbid that women have fantasies.[4]

Considering her silence on the topic of religion, I'm going to assume she's non-religious. If you know better, leave me a note in the comments.

The Politics of Sex

E. L. James may not weigh in on partisan politics or her favorite political candidate, but due to the popularity of her erotic novels, she is smack in the middle of debates about feminism and its meaning. The female protagonist in her Fifty Shades books, out of love for her boyfriend, agrees to a submissive sexual relationship that includes, among other things, spanking and whipping. This begs the question: is James promoting sexual liberation or sexual repression?

In a controversial cover article in Newsweek magazine, Katie Roiphe postulates that perhaps despite all the progress of feminism since the 1960s, women still prefer to be dominated in their bedrooms. She wrote,

It may be that power is not always that comfortable, even for those of us who grew up in it; it may be that equality is something we want only sometimes and in some places and in some arenas; it may be that power and all of its imperatives can be boring.[5]

Outrage among feminists exploded in blogosphere in response. One blogger wrote,

Our culture has seen a radical shift of ideals moving towards traditional gender roles and ,Fifty Shades of Grey, is a shining example of that. Early marriage to one's first sexual partner, having a baby even when saying neither of the partners is ready to be a parent, and submission to one's husband as the head of the household are all aspects of life that feminists and progressive thinkers have worked to move beyond.[6]

What does James have to say in response?

I don't know what all the fuss is about. . . . It's an entertaining story. A fantasy. A love story for women and that's it.[7]

Well, for all the talk, it turns out that she's about as non-political as you could get. What do you think? Are James' books sexually liberating for women? Do they promote immorality? Do they represent a flight from feminism in modern culture? Let us know what you think in the comments, but be nice now. . .

What do you think of this?

Loading comments...